Archive for May, 2007

Eight not very random things about me

Monday, May 21st, 2007

The fascinating Doctor Z tagged me (hi, Z!) so I am obediently presenting the disinterested masses with:

Eight Random Things About Me.

Now of course the only way to make this truly random would be to write every single fact I can think of about myself on tiny slips of paper, stuff the mass of them into a duvet-cover, and ferret eight out, thereby inevitably presenting the gentle reader with such gems as ‘I like marmalade’, ‘I have brown hair’ and any number of phrases beginning with ‘when I lived in Italy…’. Can I do this to you? Can I do this to myself? No I can’t. And of course, the fun is to think of eight things I haven’t really mentioned before, also, eight things that surprise people slightly (thereby keeping the reader intrigued, hah hah). I say fun – of course, I mean difficulty.

Tell you what, the Editor can edit them. That’s her job [Bah - Ed]. Thereby presenting you with:

Eight Things About Me – Editor’s Choice.

  1. Reed thinks cooked carrots are only marginally less disgusting than the pavement outside an all-night take-away. In fact, all orange vegetables are disgusting, swedes, sweet potatoes, squash, pumpkin. Why not invite her to dinner and upset the both of you thoroughly by having spent the entire day making carrot and coriander soup followed by butternut squash ravioli and then pumpkin pie with chantilly cream? (This really happened once. She ate most of it. She’s a good girl really). But she adores carrot cake. Because a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, apparantly.
  2. Reed can knit fine Shetland lace. She has been told that this is very hard. She finds it quite easy. Did I ever mention that I find her almost unendurably smug? Anyway, she used to be very shy about the fact she could knit, as peers between the ages of 12 and 26 would collapse with merriment at the very thought. Knitting is however officially ‘cool’ now, so she has Come Out. Never mind, it won’t be cool soon enough, and she can go back into her woolly little closet, which should help with the smugness problem.
  3. Reed bites her nails. This is infact an improvement on her childhood habit of chewing the cuffs of her shirts and jumpers, so we let her.
  4. She once played the Sheriff of Nottingham in a panto, complete with purple stockings, van Dyke beard and ‘tash. It was one of the more enjoyable experiences of her life. Alas, she can ham, but she can’t act, so that was that.
  5. Reed is obsessed with libraries. I have a strong feeling this only comes as a surprise to that uncle who is still inexplicably under the impression that Reed wanted to be a lawyer when she grew up (oops, that’s two things in one go. Oh well, they’re both quite boring, so we’ll let it pass). Her step-father even gave her a book of, basically, Library Porn for Christmas.
  6. She once sprained her ankle by getting tipsy, climbing onto a table to dance, and falling straight back off again. As this happened at boarding school, she ate a whole packet of anti-sherry-breath polos while waiting for the school nurse to come and have a look (yes, I know. Sherry. At seventeen. Lord have mercy). To this day, the taste of polos makes her ankle twinge. She has got over wincing at the sight of tables, thank God, because that would be silly.
  7. I strongly suspect that her fondness for PreRaphaelite art has a lot to do with the fact she has been complimented incessantly on her PreRaphaelite hair since she was seven.
  8. She can read over 1000 words a minute. And, importantly, recall what she’s just read. This makes quite a lot of people quite annoyed. It even makes me annoyed. We think it’s because she learnt to read when she was three, Scout of To Kill a Mockingbird style, and didn’t learn the actual alphabet until she was seven. She still has to stop and sing it to herself under her breath to check which comes first, I or H. I strongly suspect that f she had been left to the tender mercies of Primary School, she’d be dyslexic, just like her sisters and cousins.

I’m supposed to tag some more people to do this. I was going to tag Sol, Aphra, Teuchter, the Singing Librarian, Helen, and SG, but they’ve already been tagged, and I was going to tag Lilian, but she very cleverly tagged herself. So, I tag Archie (unless he’s done this and I completely missed it, in which case, oops), and Bloglily, if they like to be tagged for this kind of thing, and if not, please ignore, obviously. Charlotte has ducked out altogether by promising only to do esoteric or high art memes, so I won’t tag her out of respect [for 'respect', read 'fear of satirical eye']. Unless she can pickle a cow in aspic in the middle of it.

How to… name characters and interest people

Wednesday, May 16th, 2007

It would be nice if some authors really did have a good old think when naming their characters.

Here, by my foot, as I type, is a terribly thrilling thriller named Land of the Living, by Nicci French. I think it came free with a magazine – I do hope so, as I have absolutely no memory of buying it and I like to think I have some control of the Book Mountain [Your husband says not - Ed]. I have not read beyond the first chapter, despite being quite keen on thrilly books, for one sole sad and saggy little reason. My suspension of disbelief got snapped way early. On the very first page, in fact. Because of the lead character’s name.

The book starts in the first person. A woman is recovering consciousness, and trying to remember where she is and who she is. She slowly recalls that her first name is Abbie. Then:

The other name was harder…. I remembered a class register. Auster, Bishop, Brown, Byrne, Cassini, Cole, Daley, Devereaux, Eve, Finch, Fry. No, stop. Go back. Finch. No. Devereaux. Yes, that was it. A rhyme came to me. A rhyme from long, long ago. Not Deverox like box. Nor Deveroo like shoe. But Devereaux like show. Abbie Devereaux.

And at that point I chucked the book back on the floor and went back to The Diary of a Provincial Lady.

Now, the class register is cute. I don’t mind that. And Abbie Devereaux is a perfectly good name for a heroine. No. What bugged the absolute britches off me was the little rhyme to tell us, the clottish readers, how to pronounce Devereaux. For all I know, a person recovering consciousness might indeed recall some patronising little piece of toshery they used to piss their class-mates right off with. But I have a hard-to-pronounce surname, and I have on several occasions, slow and bewildered, recovered consciousness and wondered what the buggery hell my name was. I have not once pondered to myself on its pronounciation, despite the fact only about 17% of my acquaintance ever get it right and my school-fellows used to have a very unkind nickname for me to reflect my obsession with getting them to say it correctly. Because, if you are sounding off class registers in your head, or whatever else, to try and see which name dings you over the crumpet with possessive intent, you do not need to work out how to pronounce it. It has just SOUNDED in your head. It is, ergo, pronounced.

And I really, really hate being patronised as to how to pronounce names of non-Anglo-Saxon origin. We, the reader, are not all illiterate xenophobes, readers tend not to be for some inexplicable reason, and if we were, we’d hardly be gunning for a lassie called Devereaux, would we? And patronised on this issue by an author called Nicci, no less. I grew up in Italy, as far as I’m concerned she’s pronounced ‘Nietzsche’ and if she doesn’t like it she can damn well wang a K in there.

So, names. As TS Eliot so exceedingly famously remarked, ‘The naming of cats is a difficult matter.’ Personally, I find naming characters rather more fun than actually writing the novel, but it is clear to me that quite a few novelists find it beyond tedious and would give them all serial numbers if their agents would only let them. Hence that hoary old advice in many, many ‘How to write novels’ books to look probable names up in the telephone directory. I say, please don’t. I feel so sad when faced with page after page of William Browns chasing John Smiths and getting off with Susan Joneses. I mean yes, obviously, most people ARE called Susan Jones. But, even in real life, not everyone is. In my immense smugness, I have compiled some points and/or pieces of advice which are possibly more useful [Smug little... oh. You've said already].

  1. Do not fall into the opposite trap of the telephone directory (the anti-directory), and have all your characters called Finarfin Bolderdash and Arabella Ramsbottom-Smythe. Unless you are taking the piss, of course. In which case, knock yourself out.
  2. No pronounciation guides. Certainly not on the first page. Certainly not wafting about in the narrator’s consciousness on her own damn name. If you must inform us, have someone take the mick. For a good example of how to do this, see Reginald Hill’s Detective Superintendent Andy Dalziel (pronounced, of course, Dee-yell, as the Z is actually a yogh).
  3. Doing a Dickens and making the name fit the character (Cheeryble Brothers, Gradgrind, Wackford Squeers, M’Choakumchild) is very jolly, but really looked a little demented by the time Anthony Trollope (Dr Pessimist Anticant, anyone?) was doing it. Mind you, he wasn’t quite so damn funny as Dickens. It can still be amusing to do this subtly, for one or two characters. I have a character called Ian Happy, for example. And a Superintendent called Martin Able. The big irritant in my hero’s working life is called Mark Price. None of them names that’ll make you bat an eyelid, but. Heh heh heh.
  4. Try to have a reason for and history behind each name. Even the William Browns of this world were named that for a reason – it wasn’t chosen by computer, à la The Dispossessed. [But SF&F names are another post for another day, OK? Or we'll be here until midnight]. My hero, Jiro Watanabe Smith, is so named because his idiot teenage mother thought it would be romantic to name him after his (swiftly sent back home) teenage Japanese father. Jiro is her (and his father’s) first son, Jiro is a traditional Japanese name for a second son. His issues with his unusual heritage, and difficulties being accepted by both the British and the Japanese communities, are pretty much signalled right there in the spectacularly inappropriate name. Not that I will explain this in the novel, oh no. But Jiro knows, and I know he knows.
  5. Buy a good dictionary of first names. By ‘good’, I mean for God’s sake eschew all pastel coloured ones with darling infants on the front cover. Also, avoid any that are less than half an inch thick. Make sure there are long, comprehensive entries for each name, listing culture of origin, history, etymology, variants, and possibly even famous bearers. Most ‘baby name’ books have the etymologies wrong, are nauseatingly sentimental, and have no proper context for any given name. Hence recent outburst of dark-haired people called Rory, or, God have mercy, Ruaridh, I suppose. Seriously, if you name a character, say, Glyndwr Jones, and have him trotting about Wales in the 18th century, you’ll feel a right tit when someone points out Glyndwr only came into use as a first name in the early 20th century. As they invariably will. The Penguin Dictionary of First Names is pretty good. It’s the one I am slowly battering to papery oblivion.
  6. If you know nothing, or, worse, very little, about the culture you are depicting, don’t go there. A novel set in small-town America, in which every woman is called Darlene and every man Chuck or Hank, will make you look like a twit. Ditto and more so a story I saw once (luckily in manuscript), set in Calcutta, in which the men were called Sanjay and Asok and the women Zainab and Fatima. In the same family. Because all Indian Hindus name their sons from Sanskrit and their daughters from the Koran.
  7. Try to keep the names age-appropriate. Some authors really have a tin ear for naming fashions. I really have read books set today in which everyone, whether eight or eighty, has been called Pat and Jean and Alfred and Horace. And one or two in which everyone has been Jack and Chloe and Luke and Kayleigh. The Penguin Dictionary has lists at the back for which names were most popular for the past ten decades. That kind of thing is really quite useful.
  8. And, finally, nothing hacks me personally off more than getting about a third of the way into a modern novel and realising all the men are still referred to as ‘Smith’ and ‘Petersen’ and ‘Farquhar’ and all the women as ‘Susie’ and ‘Lilian’ and ‘Maisie’, regardless of how well we know the character and the character’s status in relation to the point-of-view character. What the hell is this, Jane Austen? Even Dickens, that arch, oh, so arch, Victorian didn’t do anything quite so galumphingly crass.

Ev’ry mornin’ find me moanin’

Saturday, May 12th, 2007

Isn’t work completely bloody? Even when you quite like your job and think most of your co-workers are even, dare I say it, quite nice? Nevertheless, it’s Exam Term, the students are Revolting (hoo, yes), and inexplicably everything goes completely wrong at once so quite a lot of time has to be spent working out which essential bits of the job are the least essential, in that, if I don’t do them, only I will get shouted at, so I can fit in the sudden influx of damage limitation and general running-to-stay-still that I urgently need to do, single-handed, because my job-share is on holiday in Dramatic Development Week, of course, possibly deliberately so.

Aaaand… breathe.

Anyway. Reading and writing has been rather limited to frantic emails from and confused emails to various colleagues. Books are merely those bloody annoying things that the students keep baying for and of which we simultaneously have not enough to satisfy demand and too many to fit on the shelves. And then the students keep breaking them. I have to assume not deliberately, or I’d be down Limehouse buying a machine gun. And rubber bullets, of course. I don’t want them dead, they wouldn’t have learnt the vital lesson ‘Do not fuck with the Library Assistant‘ if they were deaded.

Nevertheless, it is time to get The Novel out again, and, mayhap, actually work on it. Do you think?

Electioneering [Late, as usual - Ed]

Monday, May 7th, 2007

No, I did not vote. London doesn’t do local elections when the rest of Bucolia does. London is far too busy pontificating in any case, on whatever-it-is the dear little hayseeds think they could possibly be doing by voting in the first place. Bless their little hopeful hearts. A difference? Ah ha ha ha. They’d actually all have to vote at that point. Oh yes.

Sorry, do I sound sarcastic? I do hope so. I was trying very hard. I’ve been silent so long I worry I’ve got out of practice.

So, Elections, Local, Welsh, and Scottish. Just at present I thought I’d keep my own political views out of it. For the record, they are dyed-in-the-wool crimson and somewhat to the left of Gandhi, the Dalai Lama, and Tony Benn*. Allow this information to influence your judgment as you will. So, leaving entirely aside the question of who you may have voted for [Unless it was the BNP, in which case Reed will come round to your house with photographs of a) tortured asylum seekers and b) of every famous and useful British citizen of less than utter Anglo-Saxonity and wreck your afternoon], let us stick to the mere subject of voting per se. I thought I’d waste a tea-break trawling through all the intelligent and thoughtful comments left by my fellow citizens on the subject of voting in general. The BBC had set up a ‘Have Your Say’ page especially.

Dear God, people, but what’s wrong with you? So many, so very many snitty claims that none of the parties represented them, so they wouldn’t vote for any of them, or that it wouldn’t make any difference who they did vote for, so they couldn’t be bothered, or in one spectacular case, that they were ‘revising’ from 7am to 10pm and the polls should have been open at a more convenient time. Oh, all right, those of you who will insist on being students, bloody well be students then, but you’re letting the side down. I never let some daft exam or other stand between me and the ballot box.

Those of you who think it makes no difference who you vote for, so you won’t, you’re wrong. You seem touchingly to believe that They (as in the politicians) will notice your refusal to engage and indeed, even be concerned about it. You seem to think, for some daftly naïve reasons of your own, that They actually want you to vote.

Oh my dear saps. The last thing They want is your vote. They love it when you sit down and shut up. They each have their own inner hard-core of trusty eternals, who they can rely on to vote for them come fire, thunder, floods or the Judgment of Heaven, and they only really care when the hard-core start dying of old age and it’s time to indoctrinate a new generation. If the don’t knows, undecideds, issue-considerers, and just generally needing-to-be-convinced don’t vote, it’s wonderful. No having to waste oodles of cash trying to convince you to vote for Us not Them. No worrying that you’ll break loose and vote the other way at the General Election. No having to keep promises just to keep you on board. They can get on with fossicking about in each-other’s stationary cupboards and being self-serving and power-mad. If, on the other hand, they knew that they had been voted for, marginally, by a bunch of people who were really only choosing them because of the road-resurfacing thing, do you think they’ll fail to resurface the damn’ road? Or, at least, do you think the new lot will fail to resurface the roads, seeing that the old lot got junked for not doing it?

And yes, it is perfectly true, oh individual voter, that your vote as is straw and peanut-shells in the grand scheme of anything at all. Quite right. But the fact you voted, oh now that is an entirely more cheerful matter. As a student [incoming smug mode] I got a house of eight other students to all come down to the Polls with me and vote. All I did was announce loudly that I was going to the Polls and was anyone else coming with me? Lord knows who they voted for, or if it made any difference, but one vote suddenly became nine, as far as I can tell solely because I got off my then-much-perter bottom. How many of your friends, acquaintances, colleagues even, do you think you could dredge out of the Slough of Despond by the simple announcement ‘Well, I’m going home via the Polls. Anyone else?’

And who cares if they are all foaming idiots who vote with their scrota? They voted, they will be noted as voters, and the politicians with any kind of brain at all will panic like ants under boiling water. It’ll be hilarious. I promise.

*(No, I cannot see how leaders of great dictatorships can actually be considered left-wing regardless of what anyone’s propaganda machines say, so let’s leave Stalin for a less civilized argument some other time, because, yes, I was brought up a Communist, so yes, I do know what I am talking about, and yes, attempts to tell me that Mao is left-wing can lead to unpleasantness. But now you know).