Archive for September, 2006

Dang with added crispy nabbits.

Saturday, September 30th, 2006

It is Saturday. I have firmly told my husband I would spend Saturday writing. I have put on my Writer’s Socks (lively, nay, eyewateringly bright, hand-knits. Trés boho). My hair has automatically adopted the Writer’s Hairstyle (severely under-combed). I am Here. The coffee is Here.

And that’s it. Total blank-sheet-of-paper-itis. Just as Titania mentioned in Tuesday’s comments.

There are a couple of bloggers I adore that are not even really about writing (which is why I haven’t put them in the blog-roll, though perhaps I should stick in a category of Stuff I Just Like, So Bloody There). One of them (no, I won’t link. I’ll link when I have something (rather than nothing) to share) hasn’t posted anything at all for over a week for no reason at all that she cared to divulge. Just, radio silence. Of course, she’s probably very very busy having a life. But it gives me a little blip of agitation every morning. And I thought, well, she has hundreds of readers, and I don’t, and I feel very arrogant just thinking this, but is it fair of me to allow laziness and that flattened unispired feeling to inflict such a blip on even one of my readers, assuming any of them do blip, and why on earth should they, only people do say such kind things sometimes, and I feel a bit discombobulated by this thought, perhaps I should stick to cocoa? And what’s with all the parentheses?

Anyway, I apologise for any irregular posting patterns that may have caused blips, and I apologise even more so with extra grovelling for this incoherent mass of gibberish. You may well prefer blippage. And now I shall go and finish the book I want to review for you, and damn well review it.

Don’t mind me, I’m doing housework

Thursday, September 28th, 2006

Technorati Profile

Right. Let’s see if that works

The Editor goes spelunking

Tuesday, September 26th, 2006

Reed is in bed eating chocolate ice-cream and pondering how to be really truly deeply blood-curdling in prose. It’s clearly very absorbing. I mentioned the blog to her and she told me to post something myself if I was that bothered. I think she may have sworn at me. Such is my lot in life.

So I had a little blog-trawl to see if I could find anything interesting to remark on. And – bless the Internet and all its denizens – I found this very interesting post on the role of the subconscious in writing, by BikeProf (also known as the Hobgoblin of Little Minds. Cool name, no?) This is all highly novel and heady stuff to a mere Editor, who never normally stops to consider such impedimenta as where the reams of gibberish Reed presents me with come from.

However, we, that is, the collective entity that houses Reed and my good self, were sitting on a bench a few weeks ago, in the late summer sunshine, and generally feeling very peaceful and at one with as much nature as is generally available in an inner-city garden. Reed was not really present, having dozed off, so I had nothing much to do (it burns me to admit how dependent I am on her for entertainment). However, as I twiddled my non-existant thumbs, it was becoming increasingly apparent that there were not two but three of us in here.

Now normally Reed comes up with something, and I lean over her shoulder pointing out typos, repetitions, and shocking bad grammar, and Reed tries to ignore me, and then we wrestle for control of the keyboard. Sometimes – many times – she obstinately falls silent and tries to tune me out, and I bellow all the louder until she comes to and returns her attention to the writing. Or deletes it.

But that afternoon in the sleepy sunlight, I heard another voice. Indistinct, and very far away. Telling stories, hundreds at once, without words.

I can only surmise that Reed is trying to take dictation from this little voice, trying to fit words to the near-soundless… flavours, I suppose, or feelings, or shapes slipping down beneath the sunlight. With me screaming in her other ear all the way.

And I can’t work out if I am trying to drag her back to the firm shores of language, or if she is clinging onto me to stop herself being swept under.

Anatomy of a poetry workshop.

Monday, September 25th, 2006

So, I went to a poetry workshop. No, I will not tell you where or when, for I am gearing up to be catty. I have been to several of these poetry workshops over the years – the first when I was only seventeen, oh, and one in a tent of all places, and by heck but do all the participants come in a kit marked ‘Poetry Workshop – standard model’? It’s enough to turn a girl to Jung.

For a start, wherever the workshop takes place, and no matter how many people booked into it, there will not be enough table-space. And too many chairs. Three or four people will be attempting to create immortal verse on a knee, muttering ‘oh, no, I’m quite fine, really,’ to all solicitous enquiries from the leader, despite being bent into a hunch Quasimodo would have paid good money for. At some point, the workshop leader will insist on moving all the tables about. It won’t help. And there will be no coffee. Or, if there is coffee, it’ll be undrinkably cold and sour. But, bizarrely, the biscuits will be nice, even luxurious, so much so that they may even metamorphose into pastries. There will be a pile of paper and biros, because exactly one quarter of the participants will not have brought their own. One biro will get trodden underfoot and make a damn nuisance of itself by ruining the carpet and/or leaving brittle shards about for the play-group that uses the space on weekdays.

The basic set of participants is as follows:

  • The Workshop Leader – this is usually a genuine real-live published poet. They are also generally enthusiastic, warm-hearted, even-handed and rather attractive, and half the workshop will have a little crush on them by the first lunch-break. I have heard rumours that such a species as a sod of a leader exists, who is grumpy, or plays favourites, or is overly critical. Never met one. The exercises set by the leader will involve, at various stages, some kind of exploration of childhood memories, a timed burst of ‘free-writing’, an attempt to write a poem based on the various sensory perceptions said memories bring with them, and a great deal of reading aloud and mutual back-slapping and encouragement. This last would have been more satisfying if one was not so aware of how hard it is to think of something positive to say about at least one piece, and nevertheless how gamely one struggled to say something anyway, because the thought of leaving one writer unpraised when everyone else is getting a share of the jollies is unspeakable. Paranoia inevitably follows.
  • The Pam Ayres – a sensibly shod middle-aged woman with a genuine talent for light verse. As she has had both some experience, and some success among her friends, she votes herself the Leader’s second-in-command and also prevents anyone else getting a word in edge-ways during breaks. It would probably be counterproductive to suggest she edit out any repetitive bits or forced rhymes – she’s here for the exposure, not the instruction.
  • The Penis – invariably good-looking and affable. He has written a lot of poetry and throws himself fearlessly into readings, which he has also done a lot of. The poems are highly rhythmic and highly coloured descriptions of fast cars, fast living, expensive and exotic locations, with himself spread out in the middle of it all. He makes sure he says ‘fuck’ at least once per poem. Reed regards this sort of thing as banging one’s willy on a tree and has rather took agin’ it.
  • The Serious One – who is, in fact, so serious about doing it all properly and exactly as the Leader says to do it that he or she gets in a bit of a tiz about not having enough time, or having misinterpreted an instruction (one or both of these is unavoidable for the Serious One), and utterly fails to enjoy any of it at all. Ends up writing a rather peculiar set of poems with no coherent structure and slightly too much clichéd metaphor. Is either scowling with concentration or on the verge of tears throughout.
  • The Soulful One – writes rather good poetry, but tends to get rather carries away and either produce a very long rant about some political bête noir complete with disturbing sections about blood or corpses or female genital mutilation, or introspects at length about gender identity. The rest of the group are torn between admiration at the prolixity and nerve, and desire to eat their pastry in peace/ get on with reading their own bit.
  • The Anal Retentive – faintly disapproving of all this ‘winging it’. Would prefer to be ordered to write a pantoum or some such control-freak exotica. Realises half-way through her first reading that no one else at all gives a toss about anapaestic tetrameter. Role usually played by yours truly [Just fancy - Ed].
  • The Nonplus – This participant is, just… I… what? Despite an unprepossessing tendency to rattle on about how exciting it is to meet some creative people at last, during the warm-up exercises he or she happily shares details of childhood bonkerness that dazzle the mind. Such memories are to be used as the basis of a few informal poems. We expect great things. The Nonplus proceeds to erect an asbestos flame-wall of banality. In prose. About being excited at getting to meet some creative people at last, like as not. There is a terrible silence in which we can all see the Leader wondering if this person actually heard the instructions, or is actually channelling two personalities. Occasionally the Nonplus omits the exciting revelations and degenerates into a mere What Are You Doing Here?

Of course, sometimes you attend a workshop constructed from a deluxe set, and find several novelty collectors pieces such as The Bloke (somewhat obsessed with cars or football, nice line in self-deprecation), The Squeak (who is having such a marvellous time and isn’t it all exciting and isn’t everyone wonderful - distressing tendency to write about lonely seagulls), The Earth Mother (has Breasts, which get into everything), The Interesting Person (there to meet other Interesting People and, with any luck, get a date. Inevitably disappointed), and the I’m Only Here Because He/She Is (either sulks for the entire thing and produces nothing much, or suddenly catches afire and becomes star pupil. This probably causes bickering on the way home).

There will, of course, be a handful of unclassifiably diverse and reasonably normal people who are simply interested in poetry and want to write more of it. God bless their little hides, I say, and if only there were rather more of them.

And then, there is the Poetry Reading…

Sit up straight and put that note-book away

Sunday, September 24th, 2006

I know very well I should be posting all about the triumphant exhibition of my microphonic talents and ability to juggle socking great flappy sheets of A4 with poems by yours truly on them in teeny-tiny font (why did I do that?) while being baked alive under a bewilderment of spotlights in front of an audience composed of two-thirds professional poet to one third fan-clubs (not mine).

And I will. I have some serious sarcasm to exercise on the subject. Can’t let that go to waste.

But. I’m sorry. I found yet another notebook in the pre-poetry-reading displacement activity frenzy. This one was full of poems I wrote while I was at University.

I need to exorcise some pretty head-strong Proustian rot. And THEN I’ll be able to string enough coherent sentences together to entertain, delight, infuriate and just generally make hanging around over here seem like a fine idea.

Heh heh heh.

I absent-mindedly step on the accelerator

Tuesday, September 19th, 2006

When I started this blog, I hadn’t actually meant to have anything much to do with poetry. Oh, yes, I had written reams of the stuff, but it was all adolescent drivel, and anyway, I hadn’t written any for years and I was trying to see myself as a Novelist, ho yus. Novelists don’t muck about with verse. They, er, write novels, which I am conspicuously not doing. I am mucking about with verse. Again. Why? Does every procrastinating novelist contain a raving poetaster?

In obedience to certain personal lemming-like irrationalities, I attended a poetry workshop last weekend. I thought it would be fun. It was fun. It was such fun that I had a rush of blood to the head and agreed to go along to a Poetry Showcase and read some of my verse out-loud to actual paying people.

I think I do not exaggerate when I say that I am exactly the sort of woman who would chew through the back wall of a public toilet to escape sooner than stand up in front of a group actual living breathing drinking people and attempt to entertain them.

Expect to find oddly-shaped shreds of brickwork all down Lavender Hill next Friday.

Never apologise, never explain

Monday, September 18th, 2006

I go, I come back.

The Eleventh of September

Monday, September 11th, 2006

I know I am back at home and in striking distance of the Internets again. But this is not a good day to be writing anything much.

I could blog about It, and gouge out a fingernail’s grip on a Juggernaut already top-heavy with mourners, snipers, jeerers, whiners, snarkers, weeping, the bereaved, the traumatised, the attention-greedy, the angry, the outraged, the accusers, the accused, heroes, villains, the heart-broken and the mind-broken. I’d feel grubby and in any case I have nothing to add beyond shouting ‘Madrid! Mumbai! Iraqi civilians! Afghanistan! For fuck’s sake!’. As a response, it lacks, well, everything. You could always visit this Daily Kos diary entry and comments if you liked – a more meaningful version of ‘oh for fuck’s sake’ if I ever saw one.

I could not mention It and scribble something jolly about Writer’s Block and related trivia and then spend the next 48 hours fretting about the state of my morals.

I could shut up.

Ave atque vale, with added soliciting

Wednesday, September 6th, 2006

It does seem typical, doesn’t it, that just when I’ve made some new friends, life recrudesces and I must go away and be a decent human being for a few days. I know not if I shall be able to post – after all, people don’t get broadband so their visitors can lock themselves in the study with the computer and reduce their friendly interaction to bellowing requests for more tea through the keyhole. I will be back on Saturday or possibly Sunday, depending on the vagaries of the British workman and/or ASLEF member.

The conviction is growing upon me that I am not doing as many book reviews as I had always meant to. I have only done one so far. It is not a wondrous record. I think the problem is that I enjoy reading too much.

[Long pause while the Gentle Reader considers the bizarreness of that last statement. As do I - Ed]

I blame my parents. [Oh, really.] Very well then, I shall blame Organised Religion. Or in my parents’ case, Disorganised Agnosticism With Excess Childhood Scarring. Both my parents read a great deal and encouraged reading. My step-father, however, was suspicious of books and tended to jibes and sarcasm. My mother’s side of the family, being Catholic, view doing anything for the sheer love of it with disfavour, unless of course you happen to be suffering a great deal and your love has a martyred and self-sacrificing flavour. My father got into the habit of mocking my taste in literature and trying to force me to read Dostoevsky [She still hasn't read Dostoevsky. Nice one, Dad]. Friends and boyfriends were almost universally resentful of the amount of time I wanted to spend clearly enjoying myself all on my own without any help or input from them. While I am indeed a bloody-minded and selfish person who still jolly well insists on reading lots, I can’t quite shake the feeling it is bloody-minded and selfish of me to do so [I would have put her down as door-mat-like to the point of being exceedingly irritating]. How idiotic that I could have got to the grand and magnificent age of thirty and still feel I need a mystical permission to spend my free afternoons as I damn well please.

[What she really wants is for you all to beg her to do more book reviews. I wonder what she'd do if you all begged her not to?]

Be glad I was not here.

Sunday, September 3rd, 2006

I have spent a brisk week making a tomfool idiot of myself at work. Suffice it to say that there is now a 100-year-old copy of Euripides in the world with its back cover now upside down and masquerading as its front cover. Irretrievably. Ah, well, at least it’s no longer falling to pieces. And I have finally properly labelled two colleagues who, despite looking wildly different from each other, I had collapsed together into the same category and forced to share the same name. And I completely forgot I was supposed to be going to the theatre with a couple of good friends and went off and did something else instead, incommunicado with a dead mobile phone battery no less, and probably worried them exceedingly, for which I am most sincerely sorry. Not my most shiny and heroic week. It is probably just as well I haven’t been posting. I would have been guaranteed to start a flame-war or possibly have my computer catch afire or my server found and trampled flat by enraged hippopotami.

Am spending weekend in sack-cloth and ashes.

Addendum: As you can see, with a quick glance to your right, I have been re-arranging and expanding my blogroll. Oh, hey, it beats staring at the wee white text-box waiting for some words to turn up. We now have three categories: Comrades, for all you good people out there who I know and like and wish to invite to tea; Cohorts, for all the writery types I am finding and enjoying mightily; and Choice, for all the choicest selections of random Internet goodness. [Oh, the happy hours she spent sorting that lot out - Ed].